Do you know what has been the hardest part about getting my new solar photovoltaic system put on my house? Homeowners insurance.
How often do we really think about our homeowners insurance? For me, not very often. Like once in fifteen years when I made a claim after a massive hailstorm left almost every house in the area with a need for a new roof and siding.
So, there I am a customer of fifteen years with one claim to my name looking to switch insurance providers. Why? The company I had been with does not insure homes with solar panels installed on the roof. Ground mount installations would be fine. Even an installation on a non-attached garage would have been fine. However, mounted on my west facing attached garage roof was a bridge too far for the insurance provider.
How far? Like no consideration at all of insuring a home with solar panels even with a policy rider or similar insurance vehicle. Like no consideration for the fact that I was a long term customer with multiple policies. No way, no how.
The problem with all of this is that the solar installer requires a certificate of insurance to begin an installation. If your insurance company will not insure your home when it has solar panels you are forced to switch providers with all of the relevant switching costs and hassle in order to begin the installation. Consider it another hassle or hurdle to the broad installation of solar panels across the United States. Every impediment is a step backwards on the path to a cleaner future.
This is the challenge for distributed rooftop solar. Balance of system costs and hurdles, e.g. those costs and impediments that are not directly attributable to the PV panels or related hardware, will be what determines the ultimate penetration rate of distributed solar.
Posted in Eco-Activism, Household, Uncategorized
Tagged #myPersonalParis, balance of system, BOS, certificate of insurance, distributed generation, homeowners insurance, photovoltaic, PV, risk, rooftop solar, solar panels
The infographic from One Block Off the Grid highlights why I worry about my household’s electricity usage. Granted, as I pointed out in an earlier post, my household, on average, uses a lot less electricity than even the lowest state’s per household amount. However, resiliency, in my opinion, is about reducing my exposure to the almost guaranteed increase in the cost of electricity that is to come in the future.
Another reason to be concerned about your household’s electricity use is the growth in natural gas as a generation fuel and the continued use of coal.
Coal’s problems are well established. No matter how cleanly it is burned, coal is a dirty fuel. From mining through to combustion the list of problems is long. Whether it is mountain top removal or bad practices at mining companies or mercury or soot or some other pollutant, coal is a bad actor when it comes to energy. It’s cheap and the U.S. has a lot of coal, but that does mean we should be burning the stuff.
Natural gas seems like the better choice. It’s cleaner than coal on almost all fronts—although its clear superiority has been challenged as of late. However, hydraulic fracturing or fracking has come to the forefront as a concern. The U.S. is entering a so-called “golden age of natural gas” as fracking has opened up huge deposits of gas as viable operations across the country. The growth in gas production is starting to rearrange the entire energy infrastructure as coal is replaced en masse for energy generation and the petrochemical industry gears up to take advantage of this new found bounty.
But the environmental concerns are legion. The process of fracking is suspected in the poisoning of sub-surface water and the wastewater from the operations sits in polluted lagoons waiting to cause a problem. Don’t think vast pools of wastewater are a problem? Just ask people affected by the coal ash disaster in Tennessee or residents near manure lagoons after a flash flood. It’s as nasty as it sounds.
But, if everyone used less electricity—that oh so dreaded concept of efficiency—there would be less need for any kind of electrical generation. Furthermore, the percentage of the total generation regime that renewables accounts for could increase because polluting sources like coal and natural gas plants could be taken off line or reserved for peak load moments.
Distributed generation, e.g. photovoltaic systems on residential rooftops, figures into this equation greatly because it places electricity generation near the loads. In some regions solar PV dovetails nicely with peak demand because the prime solar generation hours coincide with the hottest times of the day and, therefore, with peak demand for things like refrigeration or air conditioning.
Then again, this all just sounds like hippie utopian thinking. Damn Ecotopia!
Posted in Eco-Activism, Household
Tagged coal, distributed generation, Ecotopia, efficiency, electricity, energy, Ernest Callenbach, fracking, Golden Age of Gas, hydraulic fracturing, Mint.com, natural gas, one block off the grid, rates, renewables, resiliency, solar, solar photovoltaic, utilities, utopia