Slow Cooker Caramelized Onions

Somehow, I found myself with a bag of onions that were starting to get a little soft and I was looking at being away from home for nearly a week.  Throwing the onions out seemed ridiculous, but no one wants to come home to a pile of rotting vegetables on their counter in the heat of summer.

Enter the slow cooker.  Using the slow cooker, a person can caramelize a batch of onions with no effort outside of maybe 5 or 10 minutes of chopping and a quick clean out of the pot eight to ten hours later.  Plus, caramelizing onions on the stove top properly takes a long time and some measure of attention.  Please do not listen to your recipes when they talk about getting onions golden in 5 or 10 minutes.  45 minutes maybe, but no less.  The sweetness takes time to develop and the slow cooker specializes in taking its time.

I just filled the crock with the onions I had on my counter and topped with a stick of butter cut into thin pats:

Onions Before

Set the slow cooker on high and leave it alone for eight to ten hours.  The end result is a pile of perfectly caramelized onions:

Onions After

One word of advice, put the slow cooker outside if you have a good place.  If you do this inside you might end up with a revolt form your family members because the smells can get pretty intense.

I usually keep a small container of the finished product in the refrigerator and freeze the rest in small batches.  Caramelized onions are the perfect flavor blast for so many dishes: breakfast burritos, burgers, grilled fish…

The Fruit is Coming!

My tomatoes are starting to bear some fruit.  The Patio tomato was the first to tart fruiting out:

Patio Tomato FirstNext, the Tiny Tim tomato started to produce some beautiful clusters of green fruit:

Tiny Tim FirstIf I can just keep the dreaded hornworms away from my crop this year, I think I will be in the fruit so to speak.  Even my blueberries–victim of some grazing deer over the winter–have fruited out some:

Blueberry First ClusterFew things are as pleasurable as seeing plants you tend produce food that you can actually eat.  It’s a small miracle, at best, but I will take it.

 

 

 

Friday Linkage 6/14/2013

The weather and what not is getting crazy.  Forest fires in Colorado turn out to be the most destructive in history every year.  First it was Waldo Canyon last year and this year we get the Black Forest fire.  In the Midwest we saw a 200 mile plus long storm front roll through this week that spawned tornadoes and the ever popular straight line winds.

For anyone who is a climate change denier, look outside and ask yourself what is going on.

On to the links…

Farm Subsidies Leading to More Water Use—Here is what is messed up about our farm policy in the United States…the programs in place often have the opposite effect of the desired outcome.  It’s amazing how messed up these things can get.

Regulatory Nominee Vows to Speed Up Energy Reviews—This just ticks me off because the White House could be making forward progress without Congress, yet is failing to take action because of some political calculus.  Ugh!

The U.S. Added 723 Megawatts of Solar during the 1st Quarter of 2013—On top of the good news, the U.S. is expected to add a total of 5.3 GW of solar capacity over the course of 2013.  That is enough to power almost 1 million average American homes with carbon free power.  Also, a 5.3 GW increase would be more than a 50% increase in the installed solar capacity in the U.S.  Damn!

Tea Party Takes On Georgia Power Over Lack Of Solar Energy—Just absorb the delicious irony of that title for a moment.  Tea Party…solar…Georgia…yep, solar power is the real deal when the Tea Party in the south is supporting its adoption.  Watch out king coal!

Master Limited Partnerships will Bring More Investment to Clean Energy—  Master Limited Partnerships (MLPS) are one of those boring, but very important, financing tools used by fossil fuel companies to acquire the capital to build out projects.  Congress is working on a bill that would expand the ability to use the tool to renewable energy.

What’s Needed to Get Sustainable Energy for All—Here is what it would take to move the entire world to a more sustainable energy future:

energy-se4all-infographic908x5223.jpg.492x0_q85_crop-smart

How Big Soda is Losing the Battle for American Hearts and Bellies—If there is one thing that you can do to improve your health—assuming you do not smoke—it would be to eliminate soda—regular or diet—from your daily routine.  The stuff is just bad news.  Maybe the tide is turning in the war against the corn syrup horde.

Cod Stocks Recover after Years of Overfishing—It seems like the news from restricted fisheries is that stocks will return if left alone for long enough.  This is probably little comfort to the people who depend on the cod stocks off North America, which have yet to recover from recent collapses, but it provides hope.

Cheap Food is a Thing of the Past—If there is one thing that will destabilize the world as climate change worsens it will be empty bellies.  Deny people their daily bread and riots ensue.

The Cool Factor (With Feathers): New York Chefs React To Pastured Poultry—  We are what we eat and we are what are animals eat.  We are also what our animals lives are like before they are slaughtered for dinner.

Edible Landscape Transforms Minnesota Lawn—Edible landscaping is awesome and expanses of green grass are tyranny.  I love the look of this garden.  It’s organic, in the organizational sense, and folksy.  I would want one if my front yard were more than a small pizza slice shaped chunk of lawn.

Climbing and Cloning Sequoias—This is an interesting idea.  Find the world’s largest trees, clone them, and distribute the clones to create groves of super trees.  I doubt that it can have a measurable impact on the carbon in the atmosphere, but it is better than giving up.

Watts For Lunch? (Or Why Humans Are Like Light Bulbs)—All you need to be a human for an average day is the power to light up one 120 watt incandescent light bulb.  Interesting.

Tiny Aerosol Particles, Big Impacts—Black carbon, or soot, is a nasty aerosol particle that traps a ton of heat in the atmosphere.  Like 650 times more than carbon dioxide alone.

Glamorous Killers Expand their Range—Cougars are making a comeback.  The animals are increasingly being seen in suburban habitats.  I am guessing that this will become more of a problem like bears in the Front Range.

You Must Read—Meat: A Love Story: Pasture to Plate, a Search for the Perfect Meal

Eat less meat.  Eat better meat.  (Page 258)

Meat is central to our idea of food.  It is primal.  A person’s position on meat—somewhere along the well-defined spectrum of vegan to Texan—defines so many other food beliefs that it is difficult to imagine a discussion about the future of food, or the present for that matter, without delving into meat.

9780425227565Susan Bourette’s Meat: A Love Story: Pasture to Plate, a Search for the Perfect Meal seeks to forge a conversation about meat’s place in the modern discussion about food.  In the prologue, the author writes:

The carnivores are back.  It’s like a bitch-slap to all those reedy, high-minded herbivores who have demanded nothing short of a bloodless revolution, dictating the parameters of the discussion, decreeing the rules for years.  Now it’s the meat-eaters who have wrested control of the food debate.  (Page 5)

No doubt.  Sometime during the past decade, vegetarians and their various sub-categories of various extremes have ceded control over the debate about the future of food.  It’s not about finding a tofu-based alternative to bacon, but finding bacon that comes from pigs raised and slaughtered in the best way possible.  The debate is over what is best now.

The problem is that we are separated from our food in a way that would have been almost unimaginable decades earlier:

Yet for most of us, meat is a mystery.  We know less about how it arrives on our plates than ever before in our history.  In part, this can be traced to urbanization, a population disconnected from agriculture and major corporations investing in the industrialization of meat production.  But something more is at play: our knowledge of foodstuffs is gleaned from a reading list of ingredients on the back of the package and not from hands-on experience.  (Page 41)

Jamie Oliver did a smashing job of showing how disconnected our children, and therefore our future adults, are from food when he asked a classroom of kids what various fruits and vegetables were in whole form.  Pictures of fairly common vegetables—I am not talking about alien looking kohlrabi here—went unrecognized.  Meat is not an animal to most people anymore.  It is a shrink wrapped slab of protein on a foam tray in a refrigerated case at the supermarket.  It is always been said that no one would eat meat from the major U.S. suppliers if they saw first-hand what the conditions were like for the animals and the process of factory slaughter.  Bucolic it is not.

Meat comes to our table as part of a larger system.  Like anything in modern agriculture, the meat on your table is the end result of a lot of actions and actors.  Therefore, the way in which the meat is raised from day one is important:

Turns out, we not just what we eat but also what our animals eat.  It’s welcome news in this puritanical age of culture that has dissected gastronomy into minute bits and bites of fat grams and trace minerals.  At a time when we think of the dinner table as a booby trap, jerry-rigged with potential landmines and enemies.  When our first question is not “Is it good?” but “Is it good for me?”  (Page 164)

If you treat the animals right and feed the animals good food then the questions of “Is it good?” and “Is it good for me?” can be answered in the same positive “Yes.”

Some of the vignettes in Meat are odd.  Obviously, the foray into raw meat dining in the high country of Colorado counts as odd.  This is not a story about paleo diets, but pre-fire diets.  Given what we know about dangerous microbes—our knowledge of beneficial microbes is pretty small—there is something to be said for utilizing the cleansing power of fire.  I am not a total advocate of pasteurization, but I do not subscribe to some pre-pasteurization ideal in that everything bad with the world comes from our obsession with cleanliness.  Some destruction of microbes is good for our health in the long run.  Sorry to bust your bubble cave people in Aspen.

I also find the piece about whale hunting in Alaska off-putting.  It’s annoying when practices are defended as cultural tradition, therefore somehow immune from criticism, even if the larger world finds the practice abhorrent.  In general, we do not accept barbaric practices on cultural tradition grounds when it comes to concepts like slavery or infanticide or…pick something that seems like it is from Game of Thrones.  Sure, the killing of whales for sustenance has a long history in the native peoples of the Arctic but times change.  Whatever, I feel like I am screaming at the wind on that one.

At times, Bourette’s prose reads like a burgeoning treatise on the gender issues surrounding meat whether it’s regarding the whale hunt in Alaska or the hierarchy on the line in a Houston kitchen.  These are easy tropes for a writer to insert—little woman in the big, bad world of meat—but they do little to advance the central tenant that meat is a central component of our food system regardless of gender.  I suppose that the imagery is just loaded with gender stereotypes because of societal conditioning—the man of the house carving the turkey or tending the grill—making it almost impossible to write about meat, or food in general, without falling prey.  Michael Pollan was accused of gender “baiting” in his most recent book because when we hear the words tradition, kitchen, and food together people automatically assume it is a diatribe about female abandonment of the domestic arts.  Whatever.

The most salient point in the entire book is not reached until near the end:

The secret of boudin is the secret of all good food.  You can watch, you can learn at the hands of the master, but the fact is that all good food is rooted in time, place, and culture.  It is idiosyncratic, unique, and expressive of the place where it’s made and the people making it.  The closer the food is to the place, the more it defines its makers and eaters, the more intense its flavors.  (Page 248)

This is something I have tried to explain to people for years.  Some foods just fit a time and a place that does not necessarily correspond to its absolute place in the culinary world, as if such a ranking were to actually exist.  No one is going to place loco moco at the top of the food pantheon, but on the first morning in Hawaii no other food puts me on “island time” quite like the gut busting local favorite.

Pre-Summer Beer Thoughts

It feels like summer might never actually get here.  Iowa received a record 17.66 inches of rain during the spring, triggering flooding, and leading to a general soggy feeling.  It’s a good thing that I have not bottled any “lawnmower beers” because I might be craving stouts if the cool temperatures and overcast skies continue much longer.

Chinook IPA

Single hop beers are taking off as brewers, both of the home variety and commercial craft type, are seeking to make beers that stand out.  A plethora of hop options also makes this possible, as do techniques like dry hopping or using freshly harvested hops.

I jumped on the bandwagon by brewing up the Chinook IPA recipe from Northern Brewer:

Chinook IPA

According to the calculations in iBrewmaster the Chinook IPA was going to clock in at ~52 IBU and ~4.9% ABV.   The bitterness was lower than the recipe called for because I reduced the boil time of the initial 1 ounce of hops to get to around the ~52 IBU, which I am beginning to think is the optimal point of bitterness.

Single hopped beers are supposed to accentuate the particular hop profile of the chosen hop.  I am not familiar enough with the Chinook variety to tell if anyone particular flavor or note was accentuated compared with a beer that has a blend of hops.  The beer did lack some of the earthy or “piney” notes of IPAs that use Cascade or Willamette hops.

The first bottle came out a little flat.  I do not know if it is the “magic” or “voodoo” of bottle conditioning, but some bottles come out less carbonated than others.  Maybe that’s another reason to make the transition to kegs and forced carbonation.  Never mind the two to three weeks cut in production time.

Next up into bottles is a recipe called Synchronicity, which should prove interesting given the use of sweet orange peel and lemongrass.

Innovation?  Really?

AB-InBev, the corporate monster behind Bud Light and about half of the world’s beer it seems, is truly showing its corporate colors lately.  Unable to innovate in terms of products, because as one commentator put it there is not much you can do to Bud Light besides add a little lime flavoring, the behemoth is turning to packaging.  Two things caught my eye recently, the so-called “bow tie” can and the new punch top.

Punch tops, vented cans, wide mouth openings…whatever is next make me laugh.  The brewer is saying to the customer, “Please pour this swill down your throat as fast as possible so that you cannot actually taste anything and you come back to the liquor store to buy more.”  In the case of Coors Light the can actually signals when it is so cold that the beer cannot taste like much more than grain steeped water.  That is the idea I guess.

AB-InBev now has aped SABMiller’s “punch top” can with a pop top that also punches a whole in the can for faster guzzling.  You see, SABMiller’s version required you use an accessory.  Granted, that accessory could be a spark plug, drumstick of the musical variety, car key, or properly branded use-specific tool.  AB-InBev has done them one better by doing away with the accessory and including the power to vent the can right there on top of the can itself.  Damn, that is innovation.

Well, if you thought that a punch top copy was ridiculous wait until you get a load of the “bow-tie” can.  Yep, AB-InBev is packaging Budweiser in a can that is said to evoke the classic inconagprahy of the Budweiser bow tie.  Huh?  Was anyone actually asking for a specially shaped can?  Does anyone actually care?  Never mind that the can actually holds 11.3 ounces of beer versus a traditional can’s 12 ounces.  Oh, and it comes in a new packaging quantity…wait for it…the 8-pack.  I cannot wait to check out the variety of packaging available for summer with the introduction of the 8-pack.

What’s next?

You Must Read—Cornered: The New Monopoly Capitalism and the Economics of Destruction

Did you pay attention during macro-economics your freshman year of college?  Not really, because you were too busy reading a copy of the student newspaper or checking out someone two rows down in the giant lecture hall assuming you even made it to the lecture…oh wait, that was me during macro-economics my freshman year.  Whoops, my bad.

9780470928561Regardless, you should read Barry C. Lynn’s Cornered: The New Monopoly Capitalism and the Economics of Destruction.  Why?  Because it is absolutely frightening on so many levels.

If you remember 2008 and “too big to fail” and the fact that many people thought we were on the precipice of economic Armageddon you need to read this book.  Sure, it’s dense and filled with passages that seem to evoke the semantic stylings of the worst of academic prose.  But, at the core, the book is telling a compelling story about the fundamental flaws in the structure of the modern economic system.

The problem, as the title of the book implies, is monopolization of the global economy.  Essentially, the efforts to restrict the concentration of economic power in the hands of very few entities has been resisted since the founding of the United States but recently has been undone as a founding bedrock principle.  Thus:

That’s why we have never before seen such power to govern our industries concentrated in so few hands.  That’s why we have never before seen such physical concentration of production—be it of vitamin C, wheat gluten, heparin, or aspirin in China, of semi-conductors in Taiwan, or of package sorting capacity in Memphis.  That’s why we have never before seen such a lack of compartmentalization of our systems and therefore such a socialization of the risk in these systems.  That’s why we have never before seen such top-down competition and thus the destruction of so many real assets, skills, and products enclosed within the fences of these corporations.  That’s why we have never before faced such a lack of real options. (Page 12)

The concepts of the free market have been corrupted by the very people who claim to practice at its altar.  You cannot question the CEO of a Fortune 500 company because he, and it is mostly still a he, is the CEO of a Fortune 500 company.  Of course he is an ardent proponent of the free market.  Hogwash!  Corporations love monopolies.  Why?  Because monopolies are fantastically good for the company that possesses the monopoly.

The scary thing is that even the patron saint of the free market, Adam Smith, was abhorred by monopolies:

Monopolists, he wrote, raise prices, suppress wages, distort investment, unsettle international relations, pervert the functioning of markets, and are “enemies of good management.”  Then, his eyes fixed squarely on the East India Company’s predations in India, Smith wrote that monopolists sometimes destroy men, governments, and nations.  Any law, he concluded, that aids the monopolist—and all monopolies are direct or indirect products of law—“may said to be all written in blood.”  (Page 100)

Damn, Adam Smith layeth the smack down upon the head of the monopolist.  Too bad the current crop of free market acolytes did not get the message.  Maybe actually reading the texts they parrot was too difficult, so they trusted ALEC to come up with an abbreviated version for legislators.  Trust us, the lobbyist said, we love the free market.

The silver lining in all of this is that monopolies can and do fail.  Does anyone buy product from the East India Company anymore?  Nope.  The excesses of monopolies, a natural outcome of having complete control, are in many ways the seeds of their own destruction.  If power corrupts, then absolute power corrupts absolutely.  The challenge in the modern era is that so much of our economy is intertwined between various monopolies that a failure of a single entity threatens ruinous calamity upon the whole of the system.  Thus, too big to fail.

Cornered can be a bit of a downer—don’t read it after watching Game of Thrones—but the message is compelling.

What a Republican Really Means

The infrastructure in the United States is crumbling.  In fact, it has been crumbling for the better part of my adult life and nothing every really seems to get done to fix the problem.  Why?  Primarily because it is very expensive, even though the repair would create jobs and the improved infrastructure would yield economic benefits, and Republicans have a new found aversion to government spending, as long as the spending is not for weapons which they love.

In Iowa there was a moment when it looked the legislature and governor might coalesce around a solution.  The gas tax, which primarily funds the road construction account, has not been raised since 1989.  Now Governor Terry Branstad (R-Clueless) has said that alternatives need to be considered because he will not support an increase to the gas tax.

The normal talking points that do not make sense are included about the public not supporting an increase in the gas tax—sure, in isolation no one supports a tax increase but given that something needs to be done which tax will be the least disliked?—and other tropes like the price of gasoline being too high, yada, yada, yada.

What Governor Braindead really meant to say is that he is considering running for office again—the horror!—and he is too chicken shit to support raising any taxes—even if it pays for needed infrastructure work—because he wants to spend another four years collecting a check for being the governor and a pension check at the same time.

Nothing like double dipping on the government tit while telling everyone how personal responsibility is the pathway to salvation.  Or the baby Jesus.  I get really confused when I hear this guy talk.

I realize it’s a translation issue, but now you know what this particular Republican really means when he says that Iowa needs to consider alternatives to raising the gas tax.